Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt Newell's avatar

Why can no one get Jevons paradox right? It's not that demand goes up when price goes down. That's not paradoxical, that's near enough tautological.

Jevons is when efficiency of usage of an input improves, such that less is needed per unit output, but total usage actually increases. That's the difference between "AI makes code faster to write so more is written" vs "AI makes code faster to write, which so greatly increases the demand for code that humans spend more TIME coding."

There is no Jevons paradox in what you describe in this article.

Ben Keating's avatar

The concierge model you're describing already existed in home services.

I watched a national painting company run an in-house call center where reps knew customers by name, knew the crews, and knew the neighborhoods. Customer retention was a competitive weapon, not a line item.

Leadership replaced it with AI tools and agency support. Sold it internally as a transformation.

The AI bot started telling customers, "We don't offer painting services." At a painting company.

Enterprise accounts walked. Not because the AI was broken. Because nobody was paying attention to whether it worked.

Your Jevons paradox framing is right. Demand for real attention is elastic and enormous. But most companies aren't deploying AI to increase attention. They're deploying it to reduce costs and calling it "concierge".

The companies that win this will be those that use AI to make their best people better. Not to eliminate the people who made them the best.

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?